Which is better performing intel chipset




















Also on the rear panel are five 3. In addition to the two PCIe 3. If you need a small LGA board with support for both Comet Lake and Rocket Lake, this is what we recommend while stocks last, and it doesn't make much sense to pay over the odds for Z when Z ITX is as feature friendly with a much better cost to performance ratio.

This, compared to other brands flagships, stood at the top of the desktop market in terms of features but also in price. Other features include a pair of full-length PCIe 4. For storage, there are four PCIe M. This makes the Godlike even better value if you can consider such an expensive outlay.

Stock worldwide for components is sketchy, to say the least. We do expect stock of the Z Godlike along with other Z models to filter into retail channels quicker as Rocket Lake's processor launch looms at the end of the month.

For those looking for Z models, we've compiled details on over 50 of them in our Z motherboard overview. We've also taken a look at over 30 budget-focused B models too:. For users looking for other options, we've also gone over multiple chipset families as well in the links below. The next step will be preparing for Alder Lake, which looks likely to be announced at some point soon. With multiple reports of next-generation Alder Lake series motherboards starting to leak, are there any models that you find interesting that we should review?

Best Intel Motherboards: October We're moving closer to the launch of Intel's 12th generation Alder Lake processors, and with that will come new chipsets including Z which has already been leaked by multiple sources. Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment. Privacy Policy. Contact Us. HyperThreading is enabled on the P-Cores, which doubles the available threads to 16, making for a total of 24 with the E-Cores factored in. That means the Core i9 K is tentatively a match for AMD's Ryzen 9 X in terms of raw core count but has to make up a little lost ground in terms of threads.

Those eight P-Cores are clocked mightily high, too. Intel says it's doing away with the TDP specification for the 12th Gen, and in some ways, I agree with its decision, if only to be fair to our poor CPU coolers.

Neither chip operates within this power envelope for the most part, however. You can make matters worse by fiddling with your chip's power to ensure a stable overclock, which is not only possible with the unlocked K-series processors, such as the Core i9 K, and compatible Z motherboards, but even encouraged by Intel this generation.

The Z motherboard you choose will play an important role in overclocking, but beyond that, the new chipset does have its benefits for everyone, overclocker or no. For starters, there's PCIe 4. That accompanies the 16 lanes of PCIe 5. The availability of plenty of bandwidth also ensures there's the potential for plenty of USB ports, although that will depend on your board choice.

You'll need to check which your motherboard supports before you buy, as no board supports both. So you'll have to stick with your decision, either way. Intel's been talking a big game when it comes to Intel Alder Lake performance, and after getting my hands on the Core i9 K, I can't say I'm surprised, either.

This chip does reclaim the gaming performance crown in almost every game we tested, and often by a large margin. Let's not forget what the Core i9 K is up against.

That's the Ryzen 9 X, potentially the best processor AMD has ever put together and the most well-suited desktop CPU for just about anything you throw at it. Not to put down the Ryzen 9 X in any way, but the Core i9 K is simply the far better gaming chip. That's really saying something for Intel's efforts in single-core improvements on the Core i9 K. It's clocked to the heavens, which sure helps, but architecturally the Golden Cove P-Cores appear to be working wonders when it counts in gaming workloads.

Something particularly noteworthy here is Intel's performance in games that traditionally favour AMD's chips, such as Far Cry 6. These would usually be the games where we'd see the biggest swings towards AMD's processors in performance, but while that is true to some extent today, the Core i9 K has managed to head off any major advances into the lead from the Ryzen 9 X.

The same goes for synthetic single-core performance. Look to Cinebench R23, which I ran through a minute cycle to ensure no power draw funny business, and you'll notice that the Core i9 K delivers a tremendous leap in single-core performance over the best of Zen 3 in the Ryzen 9 X. Even the lower-clocked Core i5 K, too, delivers a huge bump here, so that's absolutely a return to form for Intel. Pair its excellent single-threaded performance with the new wave of E-Cores and you're onto a winner in multi-threaded performance, too.

The Ryzen 9 X does hold its own in x v5. So it's not a flawless victory for Intel, though it is still a very convincing one. The reason being it doesn't work on Alder Lake, or at least our system and probably a fair few more. As I've said before, Alder Lake isn't an iterative update to an already long-standing architecture. For that, it appears some creases weren't ironed out ahead of launch, and one is the occasional incompatible game, as Intel stated ahead of time in regards to DRM solution, Denuvo.

Intel said it was yet to remedy an issue with Denuvo on Alder Lake for 32 games, which was causing issues playing these games on the platform, but the remainder of the library was good to go. So clearly there are still some areas to run the iron over, even post-launch. I can only be hopeful that these issues are solved early on and that new releases are correctly optimised for Alder Lake.

I would assume so, but I can't say for sure. So sit tight, and if you're a big Assassin's Creed: Valhalla fan, maybe stick with your old CPU for a little while before upgrading to the 12th Gen.

When it comes to CPU power and thermal performance, as I mentioned before, the Core i9 K is not the most power-savvy chip going. At least in its default, out-of-the-box, state. Intel has clearly still had to push its Core i9 package to the nines to make sure it's capable of beating AMD's top Ryzen processor, and that means I'm seeing a much higher power draw under load than AMD's Ryzen 9 X during x v5.

That's even in excess of the Core i9 K, the chip infamous for its high wattage draw. At least the performance is there to justify the leap in wattage by way of comparison with Intel's own chips, but next to AMD's processors it still appears comparatively high. I mentioned at the beginning of this review that it's important to focus on the real-world performance and capability of these chips, and not get too lost in the competition aspect of it all.

But hey, I'm human, and the ongoing tug-of-war back and forth between Intel and AMD is one of my favourite spectator sports.

So let's get into what the Core i9 K, and the wider Alder Lake 12th Gen release, means for that all-important battle. Starting with comparisons to Intel's previous generation, the 11th Gen, and the Core i9 K felt like a processor launched to claim the world's fastest gaming processor title, With the Core i9 K, Intel may have built one that actually deserves it.

Windows 11 review : what we think of the new OS How to install Windows 11 : safe and secure install What you need to know before upgrading : things to note before downloading the latest OS Windows 11 TPM requirements : Microsoft's strict security policy.

As both a proposition to gamers today and a glimpse of what's to come from Intel, the Core i9 K is an incredibly exciting chip and one we've been waiting to get our hands on for a long time.

It's an exciting platform, too. Pricing is what largely decides our opinion of these impressive processors, and rumours had initially foretold of a much closer pricing battle between Intel's 12th Gen and AMD's Ryzen series. Intel's pricing wasn't quite as sky-high as expected, though, and we're left with a situation where Intel's 12th Gen could put a lot of pressure on AMD's Ryzen series.

Let's hone in on the Core i9 K we're discussing here today. That's probably going to have an impact on AMD's outlook, as the company no longer has a totally unmatched enthusiast desktop processor.

The Core i9 K is a match, and it's cheaper, effectively shifting the bar for future enthusiast desktop processors from both companies. If you scan over my benchmarking numbers, that has the potential to once again give AMD a lead in many games. But these chips are going to have to deliver a significant boost to compete at their current prices, and for once it's AMD in the hot seat to justify its premium pricing rather than the other way around.

At least AMD's AM4 platform offers plenty of cheaper motherboards today, something we may have to wait around for a bit longer to see from Intel's board partners.

As is traditional for a major new chip launch, Intel is also introducing its series motherboards alongside the new processors, but the Rocket Lake-S CPUs will also be backwards compatible with series motherboards.

Subscribe to get the best Verge-approved tech deals of the week. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Cybersecurity Mobile Policy Privacy Scooters. Phones Laptops Headphones Cameras. Tablets Smartwatches Speakers Drones. Accessories Buying Guides How-tos Deals. Health Energy Environment. YouTube Instagram Adobe.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000